0.10/0.12	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.10/0.13	% Command    : run_E %s %d THM
0.13/0.34	% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
0.13/0.34	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.13/0.34	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.13/0.34	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.13/0.34	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.13/0.34	% CPULimit   : 960
0.13/0.34	% WCLimit    : 120
0.13/0.34	% DateTime   : Tue Aug  9 02:27:21 EDT 2022
0.13/0.35	% CPUTime    : 
0.20/0.47	Running higher-order on 8 cores theorem proving
0.20/0.47	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=120 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.20/0.48	# Version: 3.0pre003-ho
0.20/0.48	eprover: Parsing a user given option argument: "(3.PNRefinedweight(PreferGoals,1,1,1,2,2,2,0.5),5.PNRefinedweight(PreferNonGoals,2,1,1,1,2,2,2),3.OrientLMaxWeight(PreferEasyHO,2,1,2,1,1),4.Diversityweight(DeferLambdas,1,1,1.5,1,1,-1.000000,0.000000,1.000000,1.000000)),1.FIFOWeight(ConstPrio),1.PNRefinedweight(PreferLambdas,2,1,1,1,2,2,2))":1:(Column 221):(just read ','): No token (probably EOF) expected, but Comma (',') read 
0.20/0.48	eprover: Parsing a user given option argument: "(3.PNRefinedweight(PreferGoals,1,1,1,2,2,2,0.5),5.PNRefinedweight(PreferNonGoals,2,1,1,1,2,2,2),3.OrientLMaxWeight(PreferEasyHO,2,1,2,1,1),4.Diversityweight(DeferLambdas,1,1,1.5,1,1,-1.000000,0.000000,1.000000,1.000000)),1.FIFOWeight(ConstPrio),1.PNRefinedweight(PreferLambdas,2,1,1,1,2,2,2))":1:(Column 221):(just read ','): No token (probably EOF) expected, but Comma (',') read 
0.20/0.48	eprover: Parsing a user given option argument: "(3.PNRefinedweight(PreferGoals,1,1,1,2,2,2,0.5),5.PNRefinedweight(PreferNonGoals,2,1,1,1,2,2,2),3.OrientLMaxWeight(PreferEasyHO,2,1,2,1,1),4.Diversityweight(DeferLambdas,1,1,1.5,1,1,-1.000000,0.000000,1.000000,1.000000)),1.FIFOWeight(ConstPrio),1.PNRefinedweight(PreferLambdas,2,1,1,1,2,2,2))":1:(Column 221):(just read ','): No token (probably EOF) expected, but Comma (',') read 
0.20/0.48	eprover: Parsing a user given option argument: "(3.PNRefinedweight(PreferGoals,1,1,1,2,2,2,0.5),5.PNRefinedweight(PreferNonGoals,2,1,1,1,2,2,2),3.OrientLMaxWeight(PreferEasyHO,2,1,2,1,1),4.Diversityweight(DeferLambdas,1,1,1.5,1,1,-1.000000,0.000000,1.000000,1.000000)),1.FIFOWeight(ConstPrio),1.PNRefinedweight(PreferLambdas,2,1,1,1,2,2,2))":1:(Column 221):(just read ','): No token (probably EOF) expected, but Comma (',') read 
0.20/0.49	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMNHHA.
0.20/0.49	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.20/0.49	# Starting post_as_ho5 with 600s (5) cores
0.20/0.49	# Starting sh2lt with 120s (1) cores
0.20/0.49	# Starting ehoh_best8_lambda with 120s (1) cores
0.20/0.49	# Starting post_as_ho10 with 120s (1) cores
0.20/0.49	# post_as_ho5 with pid 13180 completed with status 0
0.20/0.49	# Result found by post_as_ho5
0.20/0.49	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMNHHA.
0.20/0.49	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.20/0.49	# Starting post_as_ho5 with 600s (5) cores
0.20/0.49	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,true,1.0,0,2,20000,1.0,true)
0.20/0.49	# ...ProofStateSinE()=1/1
0.20/0.49	# Search class: HGUNF-FFSF00-SHHFFMBN
0.20/0.49	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
0.20/0.49	# Starting ehoh_best6_lambda with 325s (1) cores
0.20/0.49	# Starting post_as_ho5 with 61s (1) cores
0.20/0.49	# Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_nonlambdatoforall with 55s (1) cores
0.20/0.49	# Starting sh2lt with 55s (1) cores
0.20/0.49	# Starting sh2l with 55s (1) cores
0.20/0.49	# ehoh_best6_lambda with pid 13184 completed with status 3
0.20/0.49	# Starting ehoh_best_sine with 49s (1) cores
0.20/0.49	# sh2l with pid 13190 completed with status 0
0.20/0.49	# Result found by sh2l
0.20/0.49	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMNHHA.
0.20/0.49	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.20/0.49	# Starting post_as_ho5 with 600s (5) cores
0.20/0.49	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,true,1.0,0,2,20000,1.0,true)
0.20/0.49	# ...ProofStateSinE()=1/1
0.20/0.49	# Search class: HGUNF-FFSF00-SHHFFMBN
0.20/0.49	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
0.20/0.49	# Starting ehoh_best6_lambda with 325s (1) cores
0.20/0.49	# Starting post_as_ho5 with 61s (1) cores
0.20/0.49	# Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_nonlambdatoforall with 55s (1) cores
0.20/0.49	# Starting sh2lt with 55s (1) cores
0.20/0.49	# Starting sh2l with 55s (1) cores
0.20/0.49	# Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.20/0.49	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.20/0.49	
0.20/0.49	# Proof found!
0.20/0.49	# SZS status Theorem
0.20/0.49	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.20/0.49	thf(decl_22, type, epred1_1: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o) > $i > $o).
0.20/0.49	thf(decl_23, type, epred2_1: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o) > $i > $o).
0.20/0.49	thf(decl_24, type, epred3_1: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o) > $i > $o).
0.20/0.49	thf(decl_25, type, epred4_1: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o) > $i > $o).
0.20/0.49	thf(decl_26, type, esk1_0: $i).
0.20/0.49	thf(decl_27, type, esk2_0: $i).
0.20/0.49	thf(decl_28, type, esk3_0: $i).
0.20/0.49	thf(cTHM120_3_pme, conjecture, (?[X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o]:(((~((X1 @ (^[X2:$i]:(($true))) @ (^[X2:$i]:(~($true)))))&![X3:$i > $o, X4:$i > $o, X5:$i > $o]:((((X1 @ X4 @ X5)&(X1 @ X3 @ X4))=>(X1 @ X3 @ X5))))&![X6:$i > $o]:((X1 @ X6 @ X6))))&($true)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', cTHM120_3_pme)).
0.20/0.49	thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~(?[X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o]:(((~(X1 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(($true))) @ (^[Z0:$i]:(~($true))))&![X3:$i > $o, X4:$i > $o, X5:$i > $o]:((((X1 @ X4 @ X5)&(X1 @ X3 @ X4))=>(X1 @ X3 @ X5))))&![X6:$i > $o]:((X1 @ X6 @ X6))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM120_3_pme])])])).
0.20/0.49	thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ![X12:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o]:(((((X12 @ (epred2_1 @ X12) @ (epred3_1 @ X12))|(X12 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(($true))) @ (^[Z0:$i]:(~($true))))|~(X12 @ (epred4_1 @ X12) @ (epred4_1 @ X12)))&((X12 @ (epred1_1 @ X12) @ (epred2_1 @ X12))|(X12 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(($true))) @ (^[Z0:$i]:(~($true))))|~(X12 @ (epred4_1 @ X12) @ (epred4_1 @ X12))))&(~(X12 @ (epred1_1 @ X12) @ (epred3_1 @ X12))|(X12 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(($true))) @ (^[Z0:$i]:(~($true))))|~(X12 @ (epred4_1 @ X12) @ (epred4_1 @ X12))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])).
0.20/0.49	thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ![X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o]:(((X1 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(($true))) @ (^[Z0:$i]:(((($true))!=(($true))))))|~((X1 @ (epred1_1 @ X1) @ (epred3_1 @ X1)))|~((X1 @ (epred4_1 @ X1) @ (epred4_1 @ X1))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.20/0.49	thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ![X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o]:(((X1 @ (epred1_1 @ X1) @ (epred2_1 @ X1))|(X1 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(($true))) @ (^[Z0:$i]:(((($true))!=(($true))))))|~((X1 @ (epred4_1 @ X1) @ (epred4_1 @ X1))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.20/0.49	thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ![X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o]:(((X1 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(($true))) @ (^[Z0:$i]:(~($true))))|~((X1 @ (epred1_1 @ X1) @ (epred3_1 @ X1)))|~((X1 @ (epred4_1 @ X1) @ (epred4_1 @ X1))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])).
0.20/0.49	thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ![X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o]:(((X1 @ (epred1_1 @ X1) @ (epred2_1 @ X1))|(X1 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(($true))) @ (^[Z0:$i]:(~($true))))|~((X1 @ (epred4_1 @ X1) @ (epred4_1 @ X1))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
0.20/0.49	thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, (((^[Z0:$i]:(~($true)))=(^[Z0:$i]:(($true))))|((epred1_1 @ $eq)!=(epred3_1 @ $eq))), inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[])]), c_0_5])).
0.20/0.49	thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, (((epred1_1 @ $eq)=(epred2_1 @ $eq))|((^[Z0:$i]:(~($true)))=(^[Z0:$i]:(($true))))), inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[])]), c_0_6])).
0.20/0.49	thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ![X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o]:(((X1 @ (epred2_1 @ X1) @ (epred3_1 @ X1))|(X1 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(($true))) @ (^[Z0:$i]:(((($true))!=(($true))))))|~((X1 @ (epred4_1 @ X1) @ (epred4_1 @ X1))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.20/0.49	thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ((epred1_1 @ $eq)!=(epred3_1 @ $eq)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(arg_cong,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])).
0.20/0.49	thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ((epred1_1 @ $eq)=(epred2_1 @ $eq)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(arg_cong,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])).
0.20/0.49	thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ![X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o]:(((X1 @ (epred2_1 @ X1) @ (epred3_1 @ X1))|(X1 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(($true))) @ (^[Z0:$i]:(~($true))))|~((X1 @ (epred4_1 @ X1) @ (epred4_1 @ X1))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])).
0.20/0.49	thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ((epred3_1 @ $eq)!=(epred2_1 @ $eq)), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_11])).
0.20/0.49	thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ((^[Z0:$i]:(~($true)))=(^[Z0:$i]:(($true)))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[])]), c_0_12]), c_0_13])).
0.20/0.49	thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(arg_cong,[status(thm)],[c_0_14])]), ['proof']).
0.20/0.49	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.20/0.49	# Parsed axioms                        : 1
0.20/0.49	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
0.20/0.49	# Initial clauses                      : 3
0.20/0.49	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
0.20/0.49	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 3
0.20/0.49	# Processed clauses                    : 27
0.20/0.49	# ...of these trivial                  : 1
0.20/0.49	# ...subsumed                          : 2
0.20/0.49	# ...remaining for further processing  : 24
0.20/0.49	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.20/0.49	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.20/0.49	# Backward-subsumed                    : 1
0.20/0.49	# Backward-rewritten                   : 5
0.20/0.49	# Generated clauses                    : 56
0.20/0.49	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 39
0.20/0.49	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.20/0.49	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.20/0.49	# Paramodulations                      : 8
0.20/0.49	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.20/0.49	# NegExts                              : 3
0.20/0.49	# Equation resolutions                 : 0
0.20/0.49	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.20/0.49	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.20/0.49	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.20/0.49	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.20/0.49	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.20/0.49	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.20/0.49	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.20/0.49	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.20/0.49	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.20/0.49	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.20/0.49	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.20/0.49	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.20/0.49	# Current number of processed clauses  : 12
0.20/0.49	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 2
0.20/0.49	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.20/0.49	#    Negative unit clauses             : 1
0.20/0.49	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 9
0.20/0.49	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 15
0.20/0.49	# ...number of literals in the above   : 32
0.20/0.49	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.20/0.49	# Current number of archived clauses   : 12
0.20/0.49	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 10
0.20/0.49	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 10
0.20/0.49	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1
0.20/0.49	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5
0.20/0.49	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.20/0.49	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 3
0.20/0.49	# BW rewrite match successes           : 2
0.20/0.49	# Condensation attempts                : 0
0.20/0.49	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.20/0.49	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 3739
0.20/0.49	
0.20/0.49	# -------------------------------------------------
0.20/0.49	# User time                : 0.005 s
0.20/0.49	# System time              : 0.004 s
0.20/0.49	# Total time               : 0.010 s
0.20/0.49	# Maximum resident set size: 1840 pages
0.20/0.49	
0.20/0.49	# -------------------------------------------------
0.20/0.49	# User time                : 0.023 s
0.20/0.49	# System time              : 0.010 s
0.20/0.49	# Total time               : 0.032 s
0.20/0.49	# Maximum resident set size: 1716 pages
0.20/0.49	EOF